Off Topic » in reply to The US didn't really win until Grant started spending lives.

The whole thread (27 posts)

• Deja vu... - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2006 10:40:05 PM
  • He wasn't much of a general, too. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/5/2006 4:58:20 PM
    • The US didn't really win until Grant started spending lives. - Bowser - 9/6/2006 12:56:30 AM
      • If Montgomery had his way, there might only have been an East Berlin (n/t) - alcaray - 9/6/2006 3:22:19 PM
        • That was all decided beforehand. Berlin WAS taken by the Russians. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/6/2006 6:10:26 PM
          • If we did not hold substantial amounts of Germany... - alcaray - 9/6/2006 6:18:56 PM
            • Conferences, Malta, Yalta, Potsdam, etc., settled all that. - Bowser - 9/6/2006 6:53:50 PM
              • You think that it was determined in advance that the USSR... - alcaray - 9/6/2006 8:57:46 PM
                • Yes. And Patton's gains had nothing to do with anything. - Bowser - 9/6/2006 9:24:44 PM
                  • No. By treaty Poland (to use one example) was to be an independant country. - alcaray - 9/6/2006 10:22:30 PM
                    • Poland was taken by the Russians. And was to have free elections. - Bowser - 9/7/2006 12:51:25 AM
  • Programme Change: The role of Condoleeza has been played today by Mr. T. Brosz - Tony - 9/5/2006 1:52:21 PM
    • I hope you weren't holding your breath... - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/7/2006 7:47:39 AM
    • I notice nobody's commenting on whether or not the parallels are there. - Tom Brosz - 9/5/2006 6:00:11 PM
      • You mean the parallel geography? - Mary Anne - 9/7/2006 1:05:16 PM
      • For instace, the parallels between "state's rights" and slavery? - Fox - 9/7/2006 3:38:18 AM
      • Let's see... - dtb - 9/6/2006 5:33:30 PM
        • re: Let's see... - Tom Brosz - 9/7/2006 1:30:58 AM
      • Interesting. As you wish. Let's look at history. EG - Chamberlain was a success. - Bowser - 9/6/2006 12:46:51 AM
      • re: I notice nobody's commenting on whether or not the parallels are there. - azstrummer - 9/5/2006 11:56:26 PM
        • The party names are largely irrelevant. The attitudes are the same. - Tom Brosz - 9/6/2006 1:51:00 AM
          • re: The party names are largely irrelevant. The attitudes are the same. - azstrummer - 9/7/2006 8:47:42 PM
      • Grrrr! (n/t) - alcaray - 9/5/2006 9:46:32 PM
      • Who's furious? - Tony - 9/5/2006 6:26:45 PM
  • I've heard of conservatives being stuck in the past, but this is ridiculous. (n/t) - ER - 9/4/2006 11:57:03 PM
    • She's between a rock and a hard place - Lindy - 9/5/2006 5:25:35 PM
      • More like a the First Maroon and Cheney. (n/t) - Bowser - 9/6/2006 12:47:57 AM