.....so we don't lose face.
Bin Laden was the most wanted man in the US, according to GWB.
It's all political fluff as far as I'm concerned. We LET him escape into Pakistan the month after 9/11 by not allowing ANY bombing between the Afghan and Pakistani border so he could get away.
We may have been under the threat of nuclear blackmail. I wouldn't put it past Pakistan. After all, if anyone remembers, the head of their ISI was in Washington the morning of 9/11 in a meeting with Bob Graham and Porter Goss. He was the one wiring hundreds of thousands of dollars to Mohammed Atta while he was here.
Yet that information is buried under (cough cough) "national security".
Yeah, if you all REALLY knew what the stakes were up there on the red carpet, you wouldn't sleep well at night. We're all pawns in a global weapons and drug trade run by our presidents and ministers and their military minions. (The Christians say that S atan rules the earth.)
Current Events » in reply to More mud in the water...
We HAVE to keep sending troops to Afganistan
The whole thread (23 posts)
- Bush now HAS to invade Pakistan. After all, OBL, plutonium, nukes, democracy - - -
- FBI says, "No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11" (n/t)
- More details on this
- Very Bad Situation.
- More mud in the water...
- Pandora's Box. Toothpaste and tubes. As predicted, there IS no way out.
- Let me try it this way...
- Can we amend your premise to include: "...and if we followed a rational policy"?
- re: Let me try it this way...
- Let me try it this way...
- And don't forget Somalia. (n/t)
