I'm sure he also thinks the Soviets should still be running Russia, that the Sandinistas should be running Nicaragua, that the FMLN should be running El Salvador, that we should have allowed the North Vietnamese to take over the whole thing without trouble, and the Cuba is far better off under Castro than before.

For thirty years, there have been few major international conflicts on which a large part of the Democrats did not take the other side. So what's new?

We've already seen several opinions on this board that steady electrical power and lack of violence on the streets is far more important than whether or not you're a slave. Often from the same people who think our Constitution is being destroyed by tracking phone calls. You just flew into a defense of Castro one post down. Again, so what's new?