re: The radio window

Space/Science » in reply to re: The radio window

phil — 9/27/2006 12:05:03 PM (archived)

Good news, yes we won't be as noisy much longer. Think optical and also think more efficient signalling methods that closely approximate noise.

But even at that our past and present radio emissions drop below any reasonable SNR after just a few LY, excepting of course stuff like that intentional message to a globular cluster.

The whole thread (15 posts)

Should SETI Turn Active? - LJK - 9/26/2006 5:31:15 PM
- Calling all Klingons....... (n/t) - Lindy - 9/27/2006 12:18:45 AM
- Terrible idea. - Bowser - 9/26/2006 11:17:06 PM
  - re: Terrible idea. - Vince - 9/27/2006 12:50:22 AM
  - Best lesson for a civilized planet: How Not To Be Seen. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/26/2006 11:36:40 PM
- re: Should SETI Turn Active? - Tom Brosz - 9/26/2006 6:27:31 PM
  - re: The radio window - Fox - 9/27/2006 1:14:12 AM
    - re: The radio window - phil - 9/27/2006 12:05:03 PM
      - So if the "radio window" is really that short, what does that say about SETI? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/27/2006 4:16:43 PM
        
        I sense much fear in y'all - LJK - 9/27/2006 4:54:20 PM
        
        There's only one real reason to invade an inhabited planet. - Tom Brosz - 9/27/2006 11:24:32 PM
        
        Klingons - Lindy - 9/27/2006 10:15:08 PM
        
        My statement on that is that it is raving moonbat lunacy (n/t) - phil - 9/28/2006 2:20:59 AM
        
        Caution - phil - 9/27/2006 5:37:32 PM
        
        re: Caution - LJK - 9/27/2006 5:53:10 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)