Space/Science » in reply to re: RADAR.

The whole thread (15 posts)

• Titan's Lakes - Sawyer - 9/29/2006 1:44:31 PM
  • re: Titan's Lakes - Michael Gmirkin - 9/30/2006 11:48:59 PM
    • And you're ignoring Occam's Razor, why? - Jacob Samorodin - 10/1/2006 7:01:28 PM
    • And you're ignoring Occam's Razor, why? - Jacob Samorodin - 10/1/2006 7:01:14 PM
      • Who says I'm ignoring Occam's Razor? - Michael Gmirkin - 10/3/2006 2:21:34 AM
    • The science behind the lakes hypothethis - phil - 10/1/2006 1:54:02 PM
      • re: The science behind the lakes hypothethis - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2006 12:25:35 AM
        • yes, you get a good measure of surface "roughness" from RADAR. - alcaray - 10/3/2006 5:30:07 PM
          • Fair enough. - Michael Gmirkin - 10/3/2006 10:36:10 PM
            • As I said, they made reference to the RADAR data in the article when they used the word "smooth" - alcaray - 10/4/2006 5:16:04 PM
          • re: RADAR. - Tom Brosz - 10/3/2006 8:38:29 PM
            • Jeapardy answers (n/t) - alcaray - 10/3/2006 9:28:09 PM
        • re: The science behind the lakes hypothethis - Michael Gmirkin - 10/2/2006 11:48:30 PM
          • Minor correction and some other thoughts... - Michael Gmirkin - 10/3/2006 12:18:50 AM
    • Am I missing something? - Sawyer - 10/1/2006 12:37:54 PM