Space/Science » in reply to If so, then what does it mean? Why so much hydrogen at the poles, and so little elsewhere?

The whole thread (18 posts)

• No lunar ice on the poles - Raoul - 10/18/2006 6:13:28 PM
  • Lunar warming? - ER - 10/19/2006 1:13:03 PM
    • If I understand correctly... - alcaray - 10/19/2006 6:15:35 PM
      • re: If I understand correctly... - Ken Murphy - 10/21/2006 12:28:16 AM
        • re: If I understand correctly... - gbaikie - 10/21/2006 7:06:17 AM
      • Understood...Too bad, ice would have been nice. (n/t) - ER - 10/19/2006 7:53:32 PM
      • re: Non shadowed regions.....for a little while - Raoul - 10/19/2006 7:38:44 PM
  • re: No lunar ice on the poles - gbaikie - 10/19/2006 12:30:27 PM
    • re: No lunar ice on the poles - gbaikie - 10/20/2006 12:06:40 PM
  • If so, then what does it mean? Why so much hydrogen at the poles, and so little elsewhere? - alcaray - 10/18/2006 10:19:00 PM
    • re: Colder places - Raoul - 10/19/2006 5:28:51 AM
      • No. The point of this observation was that they found... - alcaray - 10/19/2006 3:39:47 PM
        • No they didn't - nick hoffman - 10/20/2006 4:56:00 AM
          • By the same token, we have never detected Hydrogen at all, only neutrons (and the lack of them). - alcaray - 10/20/2006 4:10:42 PM
            • Hydrogen but no ice? (n/t) - Adam - 10/20/2006 8:12:17 PM
          • Thank You (n/t) - Peter Bruener - 10/20/2006 5:44:49 AM
  • re: No lunar ice on the poles - Jeff F - 10/18/2006 8:15:43 PM
    • Maybe - Adam - 10/18/2006 8:55:51 PM