Maybe

Space/Science » in reply to re: No lunar ice on the poles

Maybe

Adam — 10/18/2006 8:55:51 PM (archived)

Hi Guys

The hydrogen seems to be a lot more diffuse, so no frost deposits, except perhaps in the permanently shaded craters as the article implies. However since freshly broken up rocks can look like ice there's no reason to think the data seen from the shaded craters will be ice either.

Adam

The whole thread (18 posts)

No lunar ice on the poles - Raoul - 10/18/2006 6:13:28 PM
- Lunar warming? - ER - 10/19/2006 1:13:03 PM
  - If I understand correctly... - alcaray - 10/19/2006 6:15:35 PM
    - re: If I understand correctly... - Ken Murphy - 10/21/2006 12:28:16 AM
      - re: If I understand correctly... - gbaikie - 10/21/2006 7:06:17 AM
    - Understood...Too bad, ice would have been nice. (n/t) - ER - 10/19/2006 7:53:32 PM
    - re: Non shadowed regions.....for a little while - Raoul - 10/19/2006 7:38:44 PM
- re: No lunar ice on the poles - gbaikie - 10/19/2006 12:30:27 PM
  - re: No lunar ice on the poles - gbaikie - 10/20/2006 12:06:40 PM
- If so, then what does it mean? Why so much hydrogen at the poles, and so little elsewhere? - alcaray - 10/18/2006 10:19:00 PM
  - re: Colder places - Raoul - 10/19/2006 5:28:51 AM
    - No. The point of this observation was that they found... - alcaray - 10/19/2006 3:39:47 PM
      - No they didn't - nick hoffman - 10/20/2006 4:56:00 AM
        
        By the same token, we have never detected Hydrogen at all, only neutrons (and the lack of them). - alcaray - 10/20/2006 4:10:42 PM
        
        Hydrogen but no ice? (n/t) - Adam - 10/20/2006 8:12:17 PM
        
        Thank You (n/t) - Peter Bruener - 10/20/2006 5:44:49 AM
- re: No lunar ice on the poles - Jeff F - 10/18/2006 8:15:43 PM
  - Maybe - Adam - 10/18/2006 8:55:51 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (18 posts)