Innocent until proven guilty

Off Topic » in reply to What is the big deal? Should be a boost to their self-esteem.

Mary Anne — 10/28/2006 11:37:57 AM (archived)

Being secure in one's person, as well as one's property and one's papers.

If there is to be a test for cause, I will get behind that. I will not support proving one's innocence for no particular reason.

It also has nothing to do with competence on the job. Plenty of people are sober and incompetent.

The whole thread (12 posts)

Don't be drug testing our librarian..... - azstrummer - 10/27/2006 4:04:23 AM
- "...when personal dignity can't outlast economic necessity." - ER - 10/29/2006 3:58:55 PM
  - I find it rather interesting you.... - Lindy - 10/29/2006 10:53:51 PM
    - It was late 70s and early 80s. - ER - 10/30/2006 12:36:09 AM
      - re: It was late 70s and early 80s. - Lindy - 10/30/2006 5:08:24 AM
- LOLOL. We don't get paid enough to make it worthwhile. - Mary Anne - 10/27/2006 12:47:23 PM
  - Random drug testing is an admission of failure - azstrummer - 10/29/2006 1:14:27 AM
  - More information - TB - 10/27/2006 11:29:19 PM
    - Their volunteers are not coming back. - Mary Anne - 10/27/2006 11:57:48 PM
      - What is the big deal? Should be a boost to their self-esteem. - Bowser - 10/28/2006 5:21:07 AM
        
        Innocent until proven guilty - Mary Anne - 10/28/2006 11:37:57 AM
        
        re: Innocent until proven guilty - Lindy - 10/28/2006 5:50:07 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (12 posts)