re: And mankind should be so lucky!

Space/Science » in reply to re: And mankind should be so lucky!

Enyo — 11/4/2006 8:38:39 PM (archived)

I don't think Vancil is saying a planetary defense is not prudent.

EP just seems to live in a land where everyone is worried about impactors.

And as we all know this is simply not so!

The whole thread (9 posts)

For as little as $35, someone could straighten Griffin out on the impact hazard - E.P. - 11/4/2006 1:33:21 AM
- re: For as little as $35, someone could straighten Griffin out on the impact hazard - Jeff F - 11/6/2006 6:33:50 PM
  - re: For as little as $35, someone could straighten Griffin out on the impact hazard - E.P., - 11/6/2006 11:35:55 PM
- And mankind should be so lucky! - Bowser - 11/4/2006 2:53:24 AM
  - re: And mankind should be so lucky! - Chris Vancil - 11/4/2006 10:27:19 AM
    - re: And mankind should be so lucky! - TB - 11/4/2006 7:54:39 PM
      - re: And mankind should be so lucky! - Enyo - 11/4/2006 8:38:39 PM
    - Planetary Defense - ljk - 11/4/2006 4:58:48 PM
      - 2007 Planetary Defense Conference in Washington, D.C. - LJK - 11/6/2006 2:46:11 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (9 posts)