So far, almost everything on this is based on the Post story. A few preliminary comments:

First, whatever current approved interrogation techniques finally came out of the other end of the last year's controversies are not by any means "known to everyone." This is a real issue, especially if attorneys start deciding the world's "need to know" overrides their legal agreements on confidentiality.

Second, I have not been able to find any original documents on this yet, although I am watching some internet sources that are very good about digging this kind of thing up. I want to see the original affadavit.

Third, I don't place a lot of confidence on what somebody's lawyers say about their clients. This goes for almost any legal case.