Of course not

Space/Science » in reply to Do you have any references that support your claim?

Of course not

R.L. — 12/17/2006 6:53:44 PM (archived)

And he cant claim to be the first to suspect that they COULD be impact ejecta- that hypothesis was made by others before the public release... further study showed that they most likely were mineral concretions... EP is a few years behind the data- as usual.

The whole thread (13 posts)

"Spirit finds blueberries?" moved to flame (n/t) - Raoul moderating - 12/17/2006 9:33:06 AM
- Spirit finds Grondine balls - E.P. - 12/17/2006 5:18:50 PM
  - They are not impact condensates (n/t) - REB - 12/18/2006 10:48:06 PM
  - Do you have any references that support your claim? - podrock - 12/17/2006 6:36:08 PM
    - Of course not - R.L. - 12/17/2006 6:53:44 PM
      - excuse me - E.P. - 12/18/2006 10:56:23 AM
        
        "what is it that it is - this theory of mine.... - podrock - 12/18/2006 3:43:42 PM
        
        He pulls this stunt a lot... - R.L. - 12/18/2006 4:27:42 PM
        
        As I said... - R.L. - 12/18/2006 3:13:30 PM
        
        You are Excused. You may leave. - nick hoffman - 12/18/2006 12:15:03 PM
  - Press release from 3 days ago - R.L. - 12/17/2006 5:57:23 PM
    - re: Blueberries are not anyone's balls... - Chris Vancil - 12/17/2006 11:51:33 PM
- You gotta admit - it was quite possibly the funniest thread yet (n/t) - R.L. - 12/17/2006 2:18:29 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (13 posts)