Though radio is one of the least expensive and most useful ways
to get signals through interstellar space. But its drawbacks include
being drowned out by natural celestial radio noise; this is one reason
why we may not be picking up the equivalent of alien I Love Lucy
shows.
Others advocate lasers, which while not being so spread out as
radio waves, would carry a lot more information and would be
easier to recognize as artificial.
Others think that infrared, such as the glow from a Dyson Shell
keeping in all the solar radiation of the star it surrounds, might be
another way to detect an alien civilization.
This long article goes into detail on the various methods ETI might
use to send signals across the galaxy:
http://www.coseti.org/lemarch1.htm
Space/Science » in reply to re: Would they USE RADIO?
Not necessarily
The whole thread (34 posts)
- Scientists call for wider search for alien life
- Here is the report online
- Science is the opiate of the masses (n/t)
- Calculating the probability of detecting radio signals from alien civilizations
- Would they USE RADIO?
- re: Would they USE RADIO?
- Howard STERN uses radio...and "stern" is German for "star".
- Not necessarily
- re: Not necessarily. I know.
- "There is no dark side of the moon. Matter of fact, it's all dark." (n/t)
- re: "There is no dark side of the moon. Matter of fact, it's all dark."
- "There is no dark side of the moon. Matter of fact, it's all dark." (n/t)
- Pamela Gay’s take on Horvat’s SETI paper
- re: Not necessarily. I know.
- re: Would they USE RADIO?
- Would they USE RADIO?
