The world only has to hang together enough to allow suspension of disbelief; it does not require flawless economics or politics. It just needs a damn good story.
I find it interesting that the author of the article you linked criticized the books because if the characters would communicate, it could have all be resolved in 10 pages. But people DON'T communicate. I've seen it time and time again in marriages and with children. Youngsters don't trust adults completely; adults don't believe children. Husbands and wives talk around things, argue and rarely get anything resolved because you've got one way of thinking and emoting butting heads with another way thinking and emoting.
The author of that article needs to get a little imagination. It's a wonderful thing.
Off Topic » in reply to Harry Potter's economics
Harry Potter is Fantasy
The whole thread (22 posts)
- How Harry Potter ends (not a spoiler)
- Harry Potter's economics
- Did you link us to the correct article?
- Harry Potter is Fantasy
- Harry Potter's economics
