So Did You Just Skim Over Or Forget This Part?

Space/Science » in reply to I do read, which is why I always knew Mars Direct was a joke (nt)

So Did You Just Skim Over Or Forget This Part?

Marsby — 10/25/2007 6:53:31 PM (archived)

So how did you miss the part where landing a large payload is first done using an unmanned lander so no crew would be risked?

Did you also miss similar plans in the NASA reference missions?

Regards,
Mark

The whole thread (33 posts)

No way to land large fast payloads on Mars - E.P. - 10/20/2007 4:13:06 PM
- I still think they should revive the original Project Orion - Laurie Street - 10/25/2007 8:43:56 PM
- re: No way to land large fast payloads on Mars - SpaceExpert - 10/24/2007 1:33:54 PM
  - Guesss You Don't Read Much (n/t) - Marsby - 10/24/2007 4:23:59 PM
    - I do read, which is why I always knew Mars Direct was a joke (nt) (n/t) - SpaceExpert - 10/25/2007 6:11:07 PM
      - So does this "Joke" cover NASA Mars Reference Mission as well? - Chris Vancil - 10/25/2007 10:33:06 PM
      - So Did You Just Skim Over Or Forget This Part? - Marsby - 10/25/2007 6:53:31 PM
        
        Sorry Kind Of Assumed Something There - Marsby - 10/26/2007 12:06:57 AM
- If only.. - Lee - 10/23/2007 4:30:30 AM
  - re: If only.. - gbaikie - 10/24/2007 1:10:16 AM
- Quite True Currently - Marsby - 10/22/2007 4:18:47 PM
  - Controlled flight obviously (n/t) - Marsby - 10/22/2007 4:20:38 PM
- Falling into Mars. - Lee - 10/21/2007 10:54:45 PM
  - Ah... no - Adam - 10/22/2007 5:13:45 AM
- Did my reply get deleted? - azstrummer - 10/21/2007 10:28:48 PM
  - Never mind. I remember now. It's on CE as well. (n/t) - azstrummer - 10/21/2007 10:34:31 PM
- Nuclear rockets - TB - 10/21/2007 1:24:24 AM
- Very interesting! - Raoul - 10/20/2007 10:48:33 PM
  - Mach 1 - nick hoffman - 10/21/2007 2:32:54 PM
- If it means a brief stopover in martian parking orbit, before descending, I don't see the problem. - Jacob Samorodin - 10/20/2007 7:32:36 PM
  - Aerobraking vs Direct Entry, and Humans - nick hoffman - 10/22/2007 11:55:01 PM
  - the article is stating the difficulties of integrating those technologies in any sort of efficient manner - Sawyer - 10/21/2007 2:09:38 PM
    - re: the article is stating the difficulties of integrating those technologies in any sort of efficient manner - Marsby - 10/22/2007 4:29:16 PM
  - The obvious solution: Phobos - Buck Galaxy - 10/21/2007 8:51:36 AM
    - Phobos Sky-Crane - Adam - 10/22/2007 5:19:47 AM
  - Skycrane will land large payloads - Jeff F - 10/20/2007 9:20:14 PM
    - not a bad idea, but that rover is not that large - E.P. - 10/22/2007 7:27:21 PM
    - 60 tonnes and counting... - nick hoffman - 10/21/2007 2:23:50 PM
      - Does Explain One Thing - Marsby - 10/22/2007 4:26:02 PM
      - re: 60 tonnes and counting... - Chris Vancil - 10/22/2007 7:14:26 AM
      - Strong structure -- no LEM here - dtb - 10/21/2007 4:29:59 PM
        
        Stratospheric practice runs - Adam - 10/22/2007 4:56:38 AM
    - re: Skycrane will land large payloads - gbaikie - 10/20/2007 10:42:36 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (33 posts)