re: Iraq isn't delivering for the Left like it used to

Current Events » in reply to "It's more appealing now now that Iraq isn't delivering for the Left like it used to. "

TB — 12/7/2007 3:26:14 AM (archived)

Lindy, I have followed the war since it started. Every disaster was loudly and extensively trumpeted by the Democrats in Washington and their media buddies. Good news? Well, heard much from either source on Iraq lately?

Casualties dropped again in November. Didn't exactly make the front pages, did it? The Democrats called Petraeus a liar to his face, including the Democratic presidential front runner. Made headlines for days. These same Democrats have been showed up in spades, and as usual, pretend it all never happened in the first place.

I'm sorry if I'm offending you, but I'm not going to help people pretend that Harry Reid is happy about the way Iraq has been going the past three months. Read some of his speeches.

The whole thread (20 posts)

The stake through the heart of Bush's Iran plan, and other damage. - Bowser - 12/5/2007 9:15:49 PM
- Truly embarrassing - Donald - 12/6/2007 2:22:27 AM
- Truly embarrassing - Donald - 12/6/2007 2:22:25 AM
- Ah, yes, I remember that. - TB - 12/5/2007 9:56:04 PM
  - are you really saying that no Invade Iran screaming came from the right? - Tony - 12/6/2007 7:00:02 PM
    - That's two. - TB - 12/6/2007 8:40:43 PM
      - "It's more appealing now now that Iraq isn't delivering for the Left like it used to. " - Lindy - 12/7/2007 2:09:14 AM
        
        re: Iraq isn't delivering for the Left like it used to - TB - 12/7/2007 3:26:14 AM
        
        "Casualties dropped again in November" - Lindy - 12/7/2007 5:43:58 AM
      - No, that was 3. - Tony - 12/6/2007 8:56:37 PM
        
        re: No, that was 3. - TB - 12/6/2007 11:21:37 PM
        
        Where did I say it was a call to war? - Tony - 12/7/2007 3:33:55 PM
  - "It's an amusing example of a faction holding down both sides of the argument all by themselves. " - Lindy - 12/6/2007 12:40:40 PM
    - "No it's not." Yes it is. - TB - 12/6/2007 5:48:12 PM
      - re: "No it's not." Yes it is. - Lindy - 12/6/2007 11:59:37 PM
      - And keep in mind... - TB - 12/6/2007 5:57:02 PM
        
        I would agree with your last couple of sentences - Lindy - 12/7/2007 12:44:53 AM
    - If anyone here is "amusing", it's you Tom (n/t) - Lindy - 12/6/2007 12:43:38 PM
  - Justification - azstrummer - 12/6/2007 3:38:22 AM
  - "The past is prologue", as the man said. - Bowser - 12/6/2007 3:34:29 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (20 posts)