LOL
Also, the major voting machine manufacturers are controlled by Republicans not Democrats. Even if the Dems wanted to commit election fraud they wouldn't have the industry clout to carry it off.
From the thread above:
Until today I was pretty much convinced that Hillary had truly pulled out an honest upset of Obama in NH because of the backlash against the recent attacks on here. Today I'm not so sure.
Are we seeing huge evidence of Diebold hacking here? These articles on Bradblog.com have some compelling arguments as to the validity of the New Hampshire vote tallying.
...When you look at the data and see that the only two candidates that didn't track almost exactly with the polls both before and after the vote were Hillary and Obama, it certainly raises some eyebrows especially given the fact that the hand counted ballots in counties without the Diebold machines matched the polls as well.
What's funny about a lot of these discussions, and a little sad, is if people ever actually INTEGRATED all the things they profess to believe at the same time...
...really only works when the race is tight Tom so your outrage that there was no concern about the Democratic victories in 2006 has little basis because of a number of things. Most Dems won by fairly wide margins.
This isn't true either. Many critical races went down to the wire, including the Senatorial races in Missouri, Montana and Virginia, and a number of House seats. Bush won in 2004 by over three million votes, and the Democrats are still squealing about being robbed.