Until today I was pretty much convinced that Hillary had truly pulled out an honest upset of Obama in NH because of the backlash against the recent attacks on here. Today I'm not so sure.

Are we seeing huge evidence of Diebold hacking here? These articles on Bradblog.com have some compelling arguments as to the validity of the New Hampshire vote tallying.

I have no idea what the political affiliation of the author is but was directed to this site from a pretty much Libertarian newsletter I get each day so I don't think this is some liberal alarmist. Please correct me if you know something about Brad Friedman that I don't know.

When you look at the data and see that the only two candidates that didn't track almost exactly with the polls both before and after the vote were Hillary and Obama, it certainly raises some eyebrows especially given the fact that the hand counted ballots in counties without the Diebold machines matched the polls as well.

Damn, I hope this isn't true. If it is we're sunk as a democracy unless these machines are banned forever and all the employees responsible are deported or tried as traitors.

If this is true as well, the question then becomes who initiated it. Was it Hillary's camp or the Republicans who want her as the eventual candidate?

Art