Judiciary

Current Events » in reply to "...it has not been established yet ..."

Judiciary

TB — 2/19/2008 9:14:06 PM (archived)

This has already seen extensive judicial review in a number of places. This Wikipedia roundup gives you a hint of the complexity of this issue, and nothing has been completely settled to this point.

The whole thread (15 posts)

More on the trial lawyers and FISA - TB - 2/19/2008 5:11:09 AM
- What McConnell really said - Tony - 2/19/2008 2:25:52 PM
- You think immunity from legal consequence of lawbreaking is a good idea? (n/t) - alcaray - 2/19/2008 7:25:06 AM
  - re: lawbreaking - TB - 2/19/2008 4:40:30 PM
    - "...it has not been established yet ..." - alcaray - 2/19/2008 8:17:59 PM
      - Judiciary - TB - 2/19/2008 9:14:06 PM
        
        yes? (n/t) - alcaray - 2/20/2008 12:07:44 AM
        
        More judicial updates - TB - 2/20/2008 12:25:59 AM
        
        Are you trying to say something with these links? - alcaray - 2/20/2008 1:51:54 AM
    - What Tony said: The shrill demand for immunity concedes the illegality (n/t) - Robert - 2/19/2008 6:18:48 PM
    - If it wasn't illegal then they've nothing to worry about. Right? (n/t) - Tony - 2/19/2008 5:06:05 PM
      - I can see you're not familiar with the civil suit process. - TB - 2/19/2008 7:08:13 PM
        
        On what grounds? - Tony - 2/19/2008 9:56:06 PM
      - not to mention they wouldn't need carte blanche retroactive immunity laws.... (n/t) - Tony - 2/19/2008 5:06:55 PM
  - "By My Hand, and for the good of the State, the bearer has done what has been done." (n/t) - Richelieu - 2/19/2008 7:29:30 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (15 posts)