What Tony said: The shrill demand for immunity concedes the illegality – Current Events – HabitableZone

Current Events

Recent posts

Recent posts

Fewer Transient Alerts coming BuckGalaxy November 2, 2026 5:48 pm (Space/Science)
This report from Congress came out last week... podrock November 1, 2026 11:22 pm (Current Events)
Happy Halloween podrock October 31, 2026 3:03 am (Off Topic)
Expect one hell of a recession/depression in 2027 Arrell October 31, 2026 1:16 am (Current Events)
Next week will get ugly.... Arrell October 30, 2026 2:02 pm (Current Events)
Sir Patrick Stewart. podrock October 30, 2026 11:52 am (Off Topic)
Bernie Taupin. A great interview podrock October 30, 2026 3:05 am (Off Topic)
A new Dwarf Planet? Arrell October 30, 2026 12:49 am (Space/Science)
John Wheeler's philosophy: "Beyond the Black Hole" RL October 17, 2025 5:00 am (Space/Science)
"Engage!" BuckGalaxy October 29, 2026 10:58 pm (Off Topic)

On this day in Current Events

1 year ago (that week) Bunker Envy ? 4 replies · Oct 30, 2025
10 years ago (that week) This election feels like waiting for the results of a cancer x-ray 14 replies · Nov 5, 2016

Log in
Register

Current Events » in reply to re: lawbreaking

What Tony said: The shrill demand for immunity concedes the illegality

Robert — 2/19/2008 6:18:48 PM (archived)

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (15 posts)

More on the trial lawyers and FISA - TB - 2/19/2008 5:11:09 AM
- What McConnell really said - Tony - 2/19/2008 2:25:52 PM
- You think immunity from legal consequence of lawbreaking is a good idea? (n/t) - alcaray - 2/19/2008 7:25:06 AM
  - re: lawbreaking - TB - 2/19/2008 4:40:30 PM
    - "...it has not been established yet ..." - alcaray - 2/19/2008 8:17:59 PM
      - Judiciary - TB - 2/19/2008 9:14:06 PM
        
        yes? (n/t) - alcaray - 2/20/2008 12:07:44 AM
        
        More judicial updates - TB - 2/20/2008 12:25:59 AM
        
        Are you trying to say something with these links? - alcaray - 2/20/2008 1:51:54 AM
    - What Tony said: The shrill demand for immunity concedes the illegality (n/t) - Robert - 2/19/2008 6:18:48 PM
    - If it wasn't illegal then they've nothing to worry about. Right? (n/t) - Tony - 2/19/2008 5:06:05 PM
      - I can see you're not familiar with the civil suit process. - TB - 2/19/2008 7:08:13 PM
        
        On what grounds? - Tony - 2/19/2008 9:56:06 PM
      - not to mention they wouldn't need carte blanche retroactive immunity laws.... (n/t) - Tony - 2/19/2008 5:06:55 PM
  - "By My Hand, and for the good of the State, the bearer has done what has been done." (n/t) - Richelieu - 2/19/2008 7:29:30 AM

HabitableZone — be civil, or at least entertaining.