"I have not forgotten the vicious attacks that I received here simply because I suspected that the greenhouse gases and the chlorofluorocarbons are not the only causes of global atmospheric changes. "

This is simply not true.
The "vicious attacks" had to do with your claim that manmade radioactive material was significantly warming the planet.
And your claim that depletion of the Earth atmosphere was making some significant affect upon global temperature.

Neither of these two claims is accurate.

As far as causes of "global atmospheric changes" the energy from the Sun is obviously the major factor. And related to this is the affects caused by cloud forming. Seasonal changes [related to amount sunlight hitting regions of the planet] is also another major factor. So, the sun and how it interacts with the Earth's various elements is the primary factors having to do with "global atmospheric changes".

"I have not forgotten the numbers RL presented with such harsh emphasis, and his statement that it “cant” happen are firmly burned in my memory.
What have I forgotten?"

RL was mainly talking [screaming] about the significance of any affect any mechanism you were proposing would have. An analogy would be is someone claiming that by lighting a match, one were to noticeably affect the temperature in some room. If the match were instead a pile of wood, that could be a different matter- a match size fire isn't going warm a room by any significant amount. And a million matches in a million rooms will also have little affect [though a million matches in one room could melt steel:]