"Is this only your opinion or do you have proof of it being correct?"
I haven't seen any accurate data that contradicts this opinion.
News accounts [regardless of quantity] are worthless btw- I'm talking about real data. And those political opinions of UN reports don't count for much either.
"As for my “predictions†they are based on my understanding of the laws of physics, such as the combined gas law, which states that pV/T = C"
You seem to be having problems following the argument:
Let's refresh your mind:
I said: "The "vicious attacks" had to do with your claim that manmade radioactive material was significantly warming the planet.
And your claim that depletion of the Earth atmosphere was making some significant affect upon global temperature."
What is not accurate is your view that there is enough radioactive material [being created] that this quantity is significantly warming the planet. If there was say trillion times more radioactive material than there actually is, then one could have a situation in which this material was warming the planet.
Same goes for the Earth's atmosphere. Few would argue that if Earth were to lose 1/2 of it's atmosphere that this would not have a significant affect upon global temperature.
So, radioactive material in Earth atmosphere has not increased a thousand times or a million times- or we probably wouldn't be alive.
I doubt the total radioactivity of earth has doubled over any length of time, though during the time when hundreds of nukes were exploded in the atmosphere there was probably a significant increase in the atmosphere's radiation level [which btw has decreased since that time].
So, it's always been a question having to do with quantity of radioactive material and understanding this quantity in relation to scale.
Same goes for Earth's atmosphere- I doubt there has been a 10% loss in last million year or so, never mind in last 100 years.
So both have to do with how much of something compared to quantity of other elements- it's all about scale, as in a lighting a match in a room would different than lighting a match in a closet, cupboard, or shoe box. Or lighting a million matches in one room
Flame » in reply to re: Good question.
re: Good question.
The whole thread (37 posts)
- A snippet for Johannes
- re:Interesting, Thank you alcaray
