re: OK You HAVE to justify that one

Current Events » in reply to OK You HAVE to justify that one

JEKing — 4/20/2008 10:22:17 PM (archived)

Strickly speaking, neither Obama nor Clinton would be able to acquire a high security clearance, because associations are taken seriously. Ergo, their qualifications for becoming Commander In Chief (who should be held to a higher standard than just any government site worker) is in question.

The whole thread (18 posts)

Obama not interested in further punishment? - TB - 4/18/2008 8:12:58 PM
- You haven't had enough debates? - alcaray - 4/19/2008 5:16:20 AM
  - Who, me? - TB - 4/19/2008 5:27:14 AM
- re: Obama not interested in further punishment? - JEKing - 4/18/2008 9:06:03 PM
  - re: Obama not interested in further punishment? - JEking - 4/20/2008 10:26:28 PM
  - OK You HAVE to justify that one - James Brown - 4/19/2008 6:39:33 PM
    - re: OK You HAVE to justify that one - JEKing - 4/20/2008 10:22:17 PM
      - re: OK You HAVE to justify that one - James Brown - 4/21/2008 6:03:59 AM
        
        True, an SSBI doesn't reach back far enough, - JEKing - 4/22/2008 3:52:38 AM
        
        re: True, an SSBI doesn't reach back far enough, - James Brown - 4/22/2008 5:20:38 AM
        
        I've had two clearances on DOD sites. - JEKing - 4/23/2008 4:02:37 AM
    - Conservatives are still pissed... - alcaray - 4/19/2008 8:41:17 PM
      - LOL! - TB - 4/19/2008 9:15:15 PM
        
        Wow! - alcaray - 4/19/2008 10:16:12 PM
- Then again, maybe you can't blame him - TB - 4/18/2008 8:26:34 PM
  - First time? - Tony - 4/18/2008 8:40:09 PM
    - re: First time? - TB - 4/18/2008 9:25:43 PM
      - Yeah,what would have happened? (n/t) - E.P. - 4/21/2008 3:29:31 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (18 posts)