Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to re: Throwing Peggy under the bus

re: Throwing Peggy under the bus

Ok, so he said that and let's say that he was making light of the matter.

My questio is, why would they opt for this "back-up landing plan"? Would the first one have been worse?

[Mr Perminov said the craft followed the back-up landing plan, a so-called "ballistic re-entry" - a plunge with an uncontrollable, steep trajectory.

He said the crew missed the target because they changed their landing plan at the last minute without telling mission control.

In October, a crew returning from the International Space Station had a similar experience, touching down in Kazakhstan 200km (120 miles) from its intended landing site, in temperatures of 6C ( 43F).]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7355912.stm

PB above mentioned that the 10G ballistic plan is used as a disposable Soyuz variant. Did they have a choice? Just asking as I'm sure those that are interested will be asking the same things.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (32 posts)