Flame » in reply to re: "One could count on ... the most virulent pro-Clinton voices..."

The whole thread (38 posts)

• Obama gives Hillary the finger - Buck Galaxy - 5/4/2008 3:42:52 AM
  • It's time to stop the silliness and unite behind Barack Obama - z - 5/5/2008 12:46:30 AM
    • "When one's candidate has reaching the point of having virtually zero probability of amassing the delegates necessary to win the nomination.." - Buck Galaxy - 5/5/2008 1:25:13 AM
      • So Clinton is a "finisher" even though she's doing worse than Obama? (n/t) - alcaray - 5/5/2008 3:16:34 AM
        • Re: Clinton doing worse - Yeti - 5/5/2008 4:01:26 PM
          • You can only say that Clinton has won the popular vote... - alcaray - 5/5/2008 5:25:32 PM
            • Clinton's lead in supers appears to be shrinking by the hour... - z - 5/5/2008 9:35:18 PM
            • re: You can only say that Clinton has won the popular vote... - Yeti - 5/5/2008 5:47:45 PM
              • I've gotta say it: - alcaray - 5/5/2008 10:30:26 PM
              • But to disregard those states is to disenfranchise those voters. - alcaray - 5/5/2008 9:35:22 PM
                • Yargh. Listen to what the Yeti said.... - Yeti - 5/6/2008 5:25:24 AM
                  • re: Yargh. Listen to what the Yeti said.... - alcaray - 5/6/2008 6:20:12 AM
                    • re: Yargh. Listen to what the Yeti said.... - UniYeti - 5/6/2008 7:12:34 AM
                      • PS - Yeti - 5/6/2008 7:13:50 AM
                    • Random noise - Buck Galaxy - 5/6/2008 6:37:34 AM
                • Popular vote in FL and MI - Buck Galaxy - 5/5/2008 11:30:00 PM
                  • Democratic Party doesn't give a rat's rump about the "popular vote." - TB - 5/5/2008 11:44:52 PM
                    • "he party is just lucky not many voters have thought it out to that point." - Buck Galaxy - 5/6/2008 1:45:36 AM
                      • I recommend valium. (n/t) - alcaray - 5/6/2008 2:04:22 AM
                    • If Republicans gave a rat's rump about "popular vote" then they would not have winner-take-all primaries. - alcaray - 5/6/2008 12:23:00 AM
                      • Not sure how that follows - TB - 5/6/2008 12:58:57 AM
                        • First off, I never said anything about "anti-voter". - alcaray - 5/6/2008 1:27:12 AM
  • Good grief. - TB - 5/4/2008 7:01:59 PM
    • Well I did put it on Flame... - Buck Galaxy - 5/5/2008 1:30:20 AM
    • Agreed...God help him if he has a gas pain while delivering a speech. (n/t) - Jody - 5/4/2008 7:23:48 PM
      • The gesture itself doesn't show intent. - Lee - 5/4/2008 7:35:10 PM
        • Does anyone have a link to the video? (n/t) - Jody - 5/4/2008 11:34:02 PM
          • re: Does anyone have a link to the video? - Lee - 5/5/2008 1:13:47 AM
            • Yeah, it was intentional. - SDAI-Tech1 - 5/5/2008 5:53:18 AM
  • attribution? (n/t) - alcaray - 5/4/2008 8:06:53 AM
  • "One could count on ... the most virulent pro-Clinton voices..." - McFly - 5/4/2008 5:23:58 AM
    • re: "One could count on ... the most virulent pro-Clinton voices..." - Buck Galaxy - 5/4/2008 7:23:06 AM
      • Was it just a 'sign' of immaturity? - RobVG - 5/4/2008 3:35:51 PM
        • sign of immaturity: - Buck Galaxy - 5/4/2008 5:20:07 PM
          • Take off the beer goggles. (n/t) - RobVG - 5/4/2008 5:33:58 PM
            • That's a good term. - TB - 5/5/2008 7:04:30 PM
              • I always thought that - Jody - 5/5/2008 9:03:17 PM
    • I think he did. - Lee - 5/4/2008 6:15:21 AM