1) I pointed out the fact that after first condemning these agents of intolerance, McCain sought their endorsement actively. You did not address this fact. I pointed out that he has had to flip flop again and reject these agents of intolerance. You did not address this either, probably it is a fact I documented with FIRST HAND SOURCES. ROBERTSON WAS NOT MENTIONED.

2) ER made a typically good post in response, I agree with what he said. I don't excuse Obama and his association with wright. I find it seriously troubling, just as I find McCain's cozying up to the likes of Parsley, Falwell, and Hagee.

3) You posted "Only the leftist religious nuts are virulently anti-American."

4) I pointed out this wasnt true, and brought up quotes by Hagee and Falwell and Robertson to show an example of religious nuts saying anti-american things.

5) You respond with "BTW, the examples you've been using pretty much nail down the second/third/fourth hand sources you've been using. You might want to do a bit of your own research (for a frigging change)." - Completely ignoring the fact that my original post included links to the actual video of McCain doing exactly what I said he was doing.

6) I rebut your accusation by providing quotes and video for you.

7) you respond only with a snide "Did I miss Robertson's endorsement of McCain?" and "You seem a lot more comfortable in this arena than in anything to do with actual policies. "

Yet I AM the one that STARTED this thread about the campaign policies of John McCain, YOU are the one that has avoided that issue and has tried repeatedly to sidetrack the discussion.... "Well, YOUR religious nuts are anti-american!" .

I never claimed Robertson endorsed McCain, he endorsed Gulliani and had a falling out with McCain due to dirty tricks he pulled against McCain and McCain's support of legislation that could hurt Robertson's cable business.

Get real, YOU are the one avoiding the issues, and its painfully obvious to ANYONE that reads the thread.