Attaching the medias bias was showing the pattern the left (including Obama) has been taking trying to smear Palin. It all comes together with the pig dressed up as a woman with heart shaped glasses, pearl necklace and lipstick, on the official Democrat.org site.
Commenting that it is all married together and hurting Americans and politics is hardly changing the subject.

Even Lettermen was confused when Obama tried to explain the lipstick remark on his show.

As far as your disrespectful practice claim.
This from a Mary Anne response here:
http://www.habitablezone.com/nexus/index.asp?SvcPt=space

Are you able to provide the author of the article, its title, and when it was published? This is an op-ed piece. I'd like to know whose op it is. "Consider the source", you know.
I'd also like to see how the Obama campaign classified the campaign payments. He says they were "disguised". Considering that he has absolutely nothing but "welfare state" boilerplate argument, and that he tries to tar Obama by association by bringing up investigations into people employed by an organization he was affiliated with, it looks like more guilt by innuendo. It really is possible to miscategorize payments and make accounting errors.
In the meantime, Sarah Palin has shown a positive pattern of abuse of power in the offices she's held.