wrong
1. article says a decade, not two as you stated.
2. the article misstates the original study, which compared 2000-2010 average to the decade 2005-2015. In other words, the original study predicts rebounding warming in less than a decade.
3. the original study doesn't represent the scientific consensus. It's just one study by one group of scientists. I have no idea whether it's right, but it's wrong to say it represents the consensus that has been established by climatologists.