Could you define what you mean by "GPR" ???

Space/Science » in reply to Perhaps they need a ground penetrating radar on the next one.

nick hoffman — 10/26/2008 11:48:35 AM (archived)

How is it different from the low-frequency radars that are routinely deployed on Planetary and Lunar missions?

Or did you mean a "Larry Niven" style *magic* radar that shows you what you *want* to see, rather than what is scientifically possible???

The whole thread (15 posts)

Some good and some bad news on the space front. - Jacob - 10/24/2008 10:46:56 PM
- re: Some good and some bad news on the space front. - gbaikie - 10/25/2008 2:23:37 AM
  - You're correct, but evidence for any lunar ice seems to be fading...unfortunately. (n/t) - Jacob - 10/25/2008 5:56:12 PM
    - re: You're correct, but evidence for any lunar ice seems to be fading...unfortunately. - gbaikie - 10/26/2008 3:25:19 PM
      - re: You're correct, but evidence for any lunar ice seems to be fading...unfortunately. - Marcia - 10/27/2008 3:12:14 AM
  - re: Some good and some bad news on the space front. - gb - 10/25/2008 2:35:14 AM
    - Perhaps they need a ground penetrating radar on the next one. (n/t) - Robert Clark - 10/25/2008 11:34:51 AM
      - Could you define what you mean by "GPR" ??? - nick hoffman - 10/26/2008 11:48:35 AM
        
        re: Could you define what you mean by "GPR" ??? - Robert Clark - 10/31/2008 5:02:08 PM
        
        SRTM is a good example of what one might desire!!! - alcaray - 10/26/2008 6:48:22 PM
      - How important is water on the Moon? - E.P. - 10/25/2008 4:41:08 PM
        
        I think I know why you're asking. - Jacob - 10/25/2008 6:22:58 PM
        
        Close, but a miss - E.P. - 10/27/2008 3:19:56 PM
        
        "I am not monomaniacal about this" (n/t) - nick hoffman - 10/27/2008 7:47:22 PM
        
        yeah - that was a laugh-out-loud moment for me as well :) (n/t) - Doug Ellison - 10/27/2008 9:24:56 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)