if it was a ransom it was terrible
and I disagree with it entirely.
If it was a payment as the WH says then there's no problem.
Is it a ransom, or is that just the conclusion you'd like to reach?
Now is it 400 m or 1.7b?
Current Events » in reply to What's your take on the cash sent to Iran?
The whole thread (33 posts)
- What's your take on the cash sent to Iran?
- the payment represented continued adherence to a masterful feat of American diplomacy and to the peaceful resolution of disputes under international law
- Obama got a nuclear deal, and made the Iranians pay for it!
- Is this the best way to deal with them?
- The Ayatollah-Class Frigates (AKA the "Dead Admiral Class")
- So it's money we owed them from 1979?
- Money "we owed"?
- I suggest you expand your news search
- By the way, it was settled out of court. n/t
- Yes, and at terms much less than Iran was entitled to
- "Entitled to". Actually pretty disgusting. n/t
- "Entitled to"? Who made you arbitrator.
- Yes, and at terms much less than Iran was entitled to
- Agreed to after 37 years. Why now.
- By the way, it was settled out of court. n/t
- I suggest you expand your news search
- About that Axis of Evil...
- Money "we owed"?
- So it's money we owed them from 1979?
- I assume that this concerns you because...
- if it was a ransom it was terrible
- Wasn't that Irans's money in the first place?
- Resembles Reagan's selling drugs to buy weapons for Iran and contras.