Besides the one being much more devastating, much deadlier, what's the difference? One is moral the other immoral?
What if the pilot gets shot down and killed? Does that change the moral picture?
Or is it that big countries have planes and bombs and poor ones don't? And planes and bombs are legitimate?
That State-sponsored terrorism such as "Shock and Awe" is OK whereas terrorism by other means isn't?
Your claim that the US is morally correct in all things cheapens the US. The US could be a much bigger country, a moral beacon instead of a run-of-the-mill torturing and terrorist machine.
Tell me how many of the Abu Ghraib knew of ticking bombs. All of them in that pigpile? Now claim that wasn't the result of Bush and Co. policies.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to Astounding.
A 500# bomb dropped on a marketplace v. 40# suicide bomber.
The whole thread (40 posts)
- How suicide bombers are recruited
- Don't you love how the leftists on this board rationalize war crimes directed at civilians by Hamas,
- You are wasting your time, Tom. These people are not smart enough to understand
- Suicide bombers are poor peoples airplanes and missiles.
- Vicious lies and hatred is the sick pervert's "Humanism"
- Sorry, attacks directed against civilians are war crimes.
- Astounding.
- How many suicide bombers were blowing themselves up in Iraq BEFORE we invaded? (n/t)
- A 500# bomb dropped on a marketplace v. 40# suicide bomber.
- Only one of these targets innocent civilians on purpose.
- Drop a 500# bomb on your city and hit only military targets. Why not nuke 'em?
- Only one of these targets innocent civilians on purpose.
- re: Astounding.
