Space/Science » in reply to NYT Profile of Freeman Dyson

The whole thread (28 posts)

• NYT Profile of Freeman Dyson - phil - 3/26/2009 12:45:50 PM
  • Science contrarian v. science policy contrarian - pwokenyaw - 3/27/2009 3:40:13 PM
    • re: "science policy" - TB - 3/28/2009 2:22:41 PM
      • the coal industry would produce good science if it had any to produce - pwokenyaw - 3/29/2009 4:27:49 AM
  • re: NYT Profile of Freeman Dyson - phil - 3/27/2009 12:06:00 AM
  • Freeman Dyson - American Retard - Retarded American - 3/26/2009 3:39:46 PM
    • He's a Brit! - phil - 3/26/2009 4:00:37 PM
      • He's a mammal! - Nonretarded Interaction - 3/26/2009 4:24:37 PM
        • ad hominem - Adam - 3/26/2009 7:40:33 PM
          • Facts is Facts! - Dr. Retardo - 3/26/2009 8:43:50 PM
            • WTF - Adam - 3/26/2009 10:08:50 PM
              • re: WTF - Retarded Retroman - 3/26/2009 11:53:55 PM
              • re: WTF - gbaikie - 3/26/2009 10:35:39 PM
                • Tragedy of the commons - Adam - 3/27/2009 11:48:44 PM
                  • re: Tragedy of the commons - gbaikie - 3/28/2009 6:58:49 AM
                    • No... - Adam - 3/29/2009 4:09:09 AM
                      • re: No... - gbaikie - 3/29/2009 8:51:54 AM
                        • re: No... - gbaikie - 3/29/2009 6:47:51 PM
                          • Purity Cults - Adam - 3/29/2009 10:08:00 PM
                • Perhaps we should pay for what we use or for what we destroy? (n/t) - alcaray - 3/27/2009 1:36:11 AM
                  • Pay to which god? (n/t) - gbaikie - 3/27/2009 4:47:05 AM
                    • The ones in government, of course. - TB - 3/27/2009 2:42:15 PM
                      • Don't put words in my mouth. - alcaray - 3/27/2009 6:55:52 PM
                    • Since I'm an agnostic... - alcaray - 3/27/2009 7:58:20 AM
                      • re: Since I'm an agnostic... - gbaikie - 3/27/2009 8:58:28 AM
                        • easy - alcaray - 3/27/2009 6:54:55 PM
                          • re: easy - gbaikie - 3/27/2009 7:47:14 PM
                            • You have an odd way of arguing that misses every point your opponent makes. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/27/2009 7:51:00 PM