Space/Science » in reply to If true, it would mean that feathers evolved on two separate occasions.

The whole thread (20 posts)

• Dinosaurs not bird ancestors after all? - TB - 6/13/2009 2:17:08 AM
  • New dinosaur gives bird wing clue - Adam - 6/17/2009 9:54:57 PM
  • Ruben's full of crap - Adam - 6/14/2009 11:49:05 AM
  • The link disappeared during the great flood - azstrummer - 6/13/2009 3:30:52 PM
    • Now THAT was climate change. - Bowser - 6/13/2009 6:32:49 PM
      • According to the story, everyone else was tainted. - Lee - 6/13/2009 8:03:57 PM
        • Hence the origin of the phrase, "taint me!". (n/t) - ER - 6/14/2009 12:23:33 PM
  • Apparently, though, they did descend from something with femurs. - Bowser - 6/13/2009 3:57:22 AM
    • Hey, knowing is half the battle - mip - 6/13/2009 4:00:00 PM
  • If true, it would mean that feathers evolved on two separate occasions. (n/t) - Lee - 6/13/2009 3:04:30 AM
    • Not unusual - TB - 6/13/2009 4:00:08 PM
      • Never EVER happens. Parallel evolution does not work that way. - David F Mayer - 6/16/2009 4:00:29 PM
        • I tend to agree - TB - 6/16/2009 4:32:23 PM
          • Biological Relationships Are Based On Homology, Not Analogy. - David F Mayer - 6/19/2009 9:37:15 PM
            • re: Biological Relationships Are Based On Homology, Not Analogy. - TB - 6/20/2009 4:30:41 AM
      • Is that why so many things taste like chicken? (n/t) - dtb - 6/13/2009 4:58:24 PM
        • The creationists are getting more and more devious - Socrates II - 6/16/2009 1:18:13 PM
          • Then there is the "Navel Theory". - David F Mayer - 6/16/2009 4:03:58 PM
            • I've actually had that argument used on me. - TB - 6/16/2009 4:37:59 PM
              • Virtual History - Adam - 6/20/2009 6:28:01 AM