I wasn't commenting on Sanford

Current Events » in reply to No I haven't changed

I wasn't commenting on Sanford

TB — 6/24/2009 8:51:16 PM (archived)

I didn't think I had to. I was commenting on the lack of consistent principles around here.

What I find particularly entertaining is that this counts with Republicans because they have morals. It doesn't matter with Democrats? What are we supposed to conclude from that?

The whole thread (30 posts)

Oh well. Looks like the Republicans can cross Mark Sanford off their list for 2012 - z - 6/24/2009 7:14:58 PM
- He's an idiot. - Lee - 6/25/2009 11:56:04 AM
  - SANFORD and Scum - carl - 6/25/2009 5:43:35 PM
- "Don't cry for me, Argentina..." - ER - 6/24/2009 8:27:51 PM
  - Ay, these Republicans are sinverguenza (n/t) - z - 6/24/2009 8:41:38 PM
    - Por lo menos, este no es marica. (n/t) - ER - 6/24/2009 11:16:34 PM
- "Abstinence" is another word with a different meaning for Conservatives. - Bowser - 6/24/2009 8:03:39 PM
- We've sure come a long way... - TB - 6/24/2009 7:25:24 PM
  - Refresh my memory: Did Clinton ever call for abstinence? - Robert - 6/25/2009 6:29:28 PM
    - As I mentioned below... - TB - 6/26/2009 2:10:57 AM
    - This thread is knee deep in bullshit. - RobVG - 6/26/2009 1:14:38 AM
    - Abstinence makes the heart grow fonder. (n/t) - ER - 6/26/2009 12:40:49 AM
  - Hypocrisy aside, Clinton never disappeared for a week without any explanation - z - 6/24/2009 10:43:09 PM
  - Do you see a grand jury demanding Sanford answer all intimate questions? (n/t) - alcaray - 6/24/2009 10:12:23 PM
  - It only applies to Republicans, not to Democrats like Clinton & Kennedy. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 6/24/2009 9:23:00 PM
  - Lessee - Who said "Character counts"? Who castigated Clinton? - Bowser - 6/24/2009 8:09:01 PM
  - Hey, it's not the Democrats who pose as the party of religious piety and moral virtue... (n/t) - z - 6/24/2009 7:54:37 PM
  - My god the hypocrisy - Buck Galaxy - 6/24/2009 7:28:29 PM
    - re: My god the hypocrisy. Indeed. - TB - 6/24/2009 7:41:16 PM
      - No I haven't changed - Buck Galaxy - 6/24/2009 7:52:26 PM
        
        I wasn't commenting on Sanford - TB - 6/24/2009 8:51:16 PM
        
        No, this counts with Republicans because they PRETEND to have higher morals - z - 6/24/2009 10:51:22 PM
        
        Can we talk about filthy rich socialists then? - TB - 6/24/2009 11:34:04 PM
        
        Go for it! Starting with Hollywood of course... (n/t) - z - 6/25/2009 1:29:14 AM
        
        And that's relevant - - - - ? How? (n/t) - Bowser - 6/25/2009 1:22:11 AM
        
        It changes the subject. - ER - 6/25/2009 10:41:18 AM
        
        The subject was hypocrisy - TB - 6/25/2009 1:36:09 PM
        
        You're the only one who's talking about redistibuting wealth. - ER - 6/25/2009 3:39:11 PM
        
        "The person who preaches and then sins is a far greater scandal than the person who merely sins..." - TB - 6/25/2009 3:43:10 PM
        
        Buck, TB - Doug Ellison - 6/25/2009 1:47:05 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (30 posts)