Current Events » in reply to No, this counts with Republicans because they PRETEND to have higher morals

The whole thread (30 posts)

• Oh well. Looks like the Republicans can cross Mark Sanford off their list for 2012 - z - 6/24/2009 7:14:58 PM
  • He's an idiot. - Lee - 6/25/2009 11:56:04 AM
    • SANFORD and Scum - carl - 6/25/2009 5:43:35 PM
  • "Don't cry for me, Argentina..." - ER - 6/24/2009 8:27:51 PM
    • Ay, these Republicans are sinverguenza (n/t) - z - 6/24/2009 8:41:38 PM
      • Por lo menos, este no es marica. (n/t) - ER - 6/24/2009 11:16:34 PM
  • "Abstinence" is another word with a different meaning for Conservatives. - Bowser - 6/24/2009 8:03:39 PM
  • We've sure come a long way... - TB - 6/24/2009 7:25:24 PM
    • Refresh my memory: Did Clinton ever call for abstinence? - Robert - 6/25/2009 6:29:28 PM
      • As I mentioned below... - TB - 6/26/2009 2:10:57 AM
      • This thread is knee deep in bullshit. - RobVG - 6/26/2009 1:14:38 AM
      • Abstinence makes the heart grow fonder. (n/t) - ER - 6/26/2009 12:40:49 AM
    • Hypocrisy aside, Clinton never disappeared for a week without any explanation - z - 6/24/2009 10:43:09 PM
    • Do you see a grand jury demanding Sanford answer all intimate questions? (n/t) - alcaray - 6/24/2009 10:12:23 PM
    • It only applies to Republicans, not to Democrats like Clinton & Kennedy. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 6/24/2009 9:23:00 PM
    • Lessee - Who said "Character counts"? Who castigated Clinton? - Bowser - 6/24/2009 8:09:01 PM
    • Hey, it's not the Democrats who pose as the party of religious piety and moral virtue... (n/t) - z - 6/24/2009 7:54:37 PM
    • My god the hypocrisy - Buck Galaxy - 6/24/2009 7:28:29 PM
      • re: My god the hypocrisy. Indeed. - TB - 6/24/2009 7:41:16 PM
        • No I haven't changed - Buck Galaxy - 6/24/2009 7:52:26 PM
          • I wasn't commenting on Sanford - TB - 6/24/2009 8:51:16 PM
            • No, this counts with Republicans because they PRETEND to have higher morals - z - 6/24/2009 10:51:22 PM
              • Can we talk about filthy rich socialists then? - TB - 6/24/2009 11:34:04 PM
                • Go for it! Starting with Hollywood of course... (n/t) - z - 6/25/2009 1:29:14 AM
                • And that's relevant - - - - ? How? (n/t) - Bowser - 6/25/2009 1:22:11 AM
                  • It changes the subject. - ER - 6/25/2009 10:41:18 AM
                    • The subject was hypocrisy - TB - 6/25/2009 1:36:09 PM
                      • You're the only one who's talking about redistibuting wealth. - ER - 6/25/2009 3:39:11 PM
                        • "The person who preaches and then sins is a far greater scandal than the person who merely sins..." - TB - 6/25/2009 3:43:10 PM
                      • Buck, TB - Doug Ellison - 6/25/2009 1:47:05 PM