The man wrote a well-known book on the subject, and his background has no indication of any of the traits you mention.
If you're talking about the website, I linked directly to that page from another source, and don't really give a rat's rump who posted Forstchen's article.
Sorry I failed to properly sort that out--I usually go to a great deal of effort to "sanitize" my sources because once a certain kind of mind sees that, for example, a report comes from the Heritage Foundation, they simply dismiss all the numbers, facts, footnotes, sources, and everything else. Even if those sources are completely separate. Sometimes this means I have to reconstruct an entire thesis from scratch sources when I could just do one link, but that's part of the game around here.
If you want, you can go to Forstchen's home page. Unfortunately, the word "Gingrich" appears on the opening frame, which again, will probably cause a certain kind of mind to simply shut all the rest out.
Current Events » in reply to Source is.... opinionated (i.e., conspiracy wacko)
Where do you see that William Forstchen is any of those things?
The whole thread (22 posts)
- EMP attack details
- EMP ATTACK DETAILS--CERTIFIED ORIGINAL NUT-FREE SOURCE LINK
- Possible Problem with Source
- Enhanced EMP weapons could cause much electronic confusion.
- EMP's occur naturally
- re: EMP attack
- Source is.... opinionated (i.e., conspiracy wacko)
- I find this discussion on Space/Science relevant to this.
- Well, that's scary as hell.
- Brought this up AT COUNCIL MEETING
