Re: pretty clear
Nothing in that tirade has the slightest relevance to the issue being discussed here. It does not accurately portray my views, and it isn't even self-consistent.
The author of the article had a premise. I showed it was full of crap up to the eyeballs. If that went over your head, I'm sorry. On the other hand, if you also agree that the author was full of crap - which would be the only possible view consistent with your own tirade - then where's the argument?