Re: A Big Mathematics Thing...
The analogy was an eyedropper, not a rainstorm. We have already proven that the numbers you have proposed, which show manmade radiation to be orders of magnitude less than natural heat fluctuations in Earth's atmosphere. The ratio is similar to an eyedropper vs. a waterfall.
For your theory to be valid, you have to submit evidence that you can overflow a lake with dozens of natural inflows and outflows by using an eyedropper.
You're locked on a mental rail I cannot seem to dislodge. I run into this in the political arena as well.