Off Topic — HabitableZone

Off Topic » in reply to Does the United States really need "state owned" TV and radio stations?

lost in broadcast land

Today, with dozens of specialized cable networks available to anyone with access to a satellite dish or cable TV (well over 80% of the population), it's harder to say what specialized need that PBS/NPR is meeting that isn't being met by the free market.
******************
As one of the 20% who only gets the 3 major networks, Fox, UPN and WB plus UHF and VHF PBS stations, I'd say that easily 80% of what we watch outside of football season is on the 2 PBS channels. That's why we contribute bucks. I'll admit that if we had Travel channel, Discovery channel and such, the PBS watching would be way down. Even as a PBS supporter, I hafta say that I cannot stand the Bill Moyers, Charlie Rich and local Boston PBS liberal intelligensia. They're big in the People's Republic of Cambridge though.

Now this time, AT&T Broadband really, really, REALLY promises that they're bringing broadband cable to our metrowest Boston suburb this summah. Really.

-philw (blocked by neighbors trees from DBS)

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (24 posts)