Re: Not bad. . .

Tom Brosz — 8/4/2002 4:13:55 PM (archived)

Without getting into any spoilers, it is entirely likely given the character of the former minister that he might not believe in firearms, and by the time the situation becomes obvious, it's a little late to change his mind.

The whole thread (11 posts)

"Signs:" A really good flick! 'Nuff said. (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/3/2002 12:28:21 PM
- I can't imagine watching a movie about crop circles. n/t (n/t) - Bowser - 8/6/2002 5:27:30 PM
  - Re: That's why it's a movie, so you don't have to imagine . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 8/6/2002 7:00:39 PM
- But, but, but Lindy trashed it! - p - 8/5/2002 3:38:13 PM
- Not bad. . . - Justin Kelly - 8/4/2002 3:03:41 PM
  - Re: Not bad. . . - Tom Brosz - 8/4/2002 4:13:55 PM
- Re: How about 'Goldmember' . . . ? - D. Spires - 8/3/2002 3:00:15 PM
  - Re: How about 'Goldmember' . . . ? - Tom Brosz - 8/3/2002 3:48:50 PM
  - Can only think of one good reason to see that movie - Matt Burley - 8/3/2002 3:10:32 PM
    - Re: She surprised me . . . - D. Spires - 8/3/2002 3:35:36 PM
- Agree - Delbert - 8/3/2002 1:44:44 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (11 posts)