Off Topic » in reply to No they weren't

The whole thread (23 posts)

• I'm a genius! - Lee - 9/12/2002 9:51:24 AM
  • Rescue - Tom Brosz - 9/13/2002 3:14:05 PM
    • Re: Rescue - McFly - 9/13/2002 4:48:24 PM
      • Engineering study of the collapse - Larry J - 9/13/2002 7:52:25 PM
        • Collapse - Bowser - 9/13/2002 6:11:27 PM
        • Re: Engineering study of the collapse - Tom Brosz - 9/13/2002 8:56:02 AM
          • Kerosene and water don't mix very well - Larry J - 9/13/2002 9:56:57 AM
            • Design for impact - Tom Brosz - 9/13/2002 10:58:46 AM
    • Access to Roof - Nick Hoffman - 9/13/2002 4:04:36 PM
  • Re: I rarely crap on ideas, but - SM - 9/12/2002 10:47:42 AM
    • That wouldn't be a problem - Lee - 9/12/2002 1:04:36 PM
      • Re: Maybe. If you've got the guts, there's all kinds of options. - SM - 9/13/2002 12:03:10 PM
        • Re: Maybe. If you've got the guts, there's all kinds of options. - McFly - 9/13/2002 4:58:27 PM
          • Re: Yes, but they would also have been a great hindrance . . . - D. Spires - 9/13/2002 8:19:44 AM
            • Which is why my idea is very practical. - Lee - 9/13/2002 3:16:45 PM
              • Problem: - Tom Brosz - 9/14/2002 8:14:35 AM
                • No they weren't - Lee - 9/14/2002 8:57:52 AM
                  • Re: Tower 2 . . . - D. Spires - 9/14/2002 11:29:50 AM
    • Re: I rarely crap on ideas, but - Scott - 9/12/2002 11:29:07 AM
      • Re: I rarely crap on ideas, but - SM - 9/14/2002 12:50:01 PM
    • Re: The pole could be enclosed in a room with self-closing (magnetic blocks) doors . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 9/12/2002 11:05:13 AM
      • Kinda defeats the purpose - SDG - 9/13/2002 10:39:58 AM
        • Re: No, that's the way stairwells work . . . - D. spires - 9/13/2002 12:18:16 PM