I don't, but for the sake of argument. Let's say that in one of the villages there was a Bofors which shot at the Spectre. It was justified in returning fire.

And, in the "heat of battle" the wedding party in another village was shot up. An extended family, grandparents, parents, aunts, uncles, sisters, brothers, cousins, shot and killed. A celebration has become a hell beyond reach of the worst nightmares.

Is there a universal point of view, does every point if view in the world have to justify that slaughter?

The family thinks it is "evil". The people who say they came to help them slaughters their friends. The soldiers say they were given bad information. The intelligence people say they did the best they could with what they had.

Now, it was still "evil" from my point of view. A good guy has to BE good, not just want to be good, or intend to be good.

Someone charges into a bank to rescue 45 hostages from the bad guys who might, just might, shoot them. The "rescuer" shoots and kills all 45. Credit for intentions? Of course not.

The universality of morality is not simplistic IF one is able to understand other people. If one can't, then it's easy to take one's own culture and declare, unilaterally, universality. (What a string of words.)

Arf