Re: Judging a book by its cover

Off Topic » in reply to Judging a book by its cover

Tom Brosz — 4/28/2003 4:06:04 PM (archived)

<No, I'm not reading a book that has placed its conclusion on the dust jacket.

Well, that explains why you also avoid Michael Moore and Al Franken... ;)

As for the property issue, I started typing up an explanation of political vs. metaphysical rights, and positive vs. negative rights, and was going to correct a couple of misperceptions on property, but got tired in the middle of it, and thought, what the heck's the point? Maybe I'm just losing my edge. Maybe I need to ramp the coffee dose up again. Sorry.

The whole thread (16 posts)

Tammy Bruce's new book - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2003 1:18:11 PM
- On attack literature - Mary Anne - 4/27/2003 2:51:27 PM
  - teenagers - SDG - 4/28/2003 6:05:07 PM
    - Re: University - Raoul Lannoy - 4/28/2003 7:55:48 PM
  - Re: On liberals and leftists - Tom Brosz - 4/28/2003 8:36:12 AM
    - Re: Reasonable conservatives - Mary Anne - 4/28/2003 12:10:41 PM
      - Re: Reasonable conservatives - Tom Brosz - 4/28/2003 3:39:13 PM
        
        100 years is just a blip on the radar screen. - Mary Anne - 4/28/2003 4:57:01 PM
        
        Re: 100 years is just a blip - Tom Brosz - 4/29/2003 4:41:27 PM
  - What I stand for (in one sentence) - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2003 4:38:40 PM
    - anyone who read that subject line and expected the shortest Brosz post ever will be sorely dissapointed :) N/T (n/t) - SDG - 4/28/2003 4:24:12 PM
      - Not the longest, either, by a long shot. [Just kidding, big guy! Love you, man!] n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 4/29/2003 6:14:00 PM
    - Judging a book by its cover - Mary Anne - 4/28/2003 12:35:30 PM
      - About property rights - Lee - 4/28/2003 6:23:31 PM
      - Re: Judging a book by its cover - Tom Brosz - 4/28/2003 4:06:04 PM
      - Re: book audiences - Fox - 4/28/2003 9:31:05 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (16 posts)