Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Mars Soc Board Adds New Members

Re: Mars Soc Board Adds New Members

==============================
You know I don't think I've ever heard a good reasoned arguement for planetary protection(lets not mention any names). It woudl be interesting to see them. I can't help but wonder maybe Zubrins views are just knee jerk reacitons to ICAMSR?

-Justin Kelly
===============================

The links Barry gave to the NASA scientists responding to Zubrin's views in the Planetary Report are some.
A charge that has been leveled at Barry is that the decision on planetary protection should be left to those scientists with the requisite training in biology. The scientists who responded critically to Zubrin's remarks are scientists with that training.
One scientist in particular probably has the most extensive knowledge both of extremophiles and the conditions on Mars, Kenneth Nealson. In fact he chaired the committee that wrote the prior National Academy of Sciences report on Mars Sample Return. It is interesting that Nealson now proposes further in situ life testing before samples are returned from Mars.
An article that describes the current plans for planetary protection of Mars samples is on Spacedaily.com :

Prepare Now For Martian Samples Warn Scientists
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-life-01f.html

It has a link to the National Academy of Sciences report on the issue:

Examining the Evidence for Life on Mars
http://national-academies.org/webextra/mars

In the Spacedaily.com article I found one passage particularly interesting:

"The committee proposed specific guidelines for release of samples from the facility. If found to contain no organic matter or other evidence of life, they could be released without sterilization.
"If the samples contain possible evidence of life, which is the most likely case, portions that have been sterilized by heat or gamma radiation could be certified for release and study elsewhere.
"If the samples are found to contain unmistakable evidence of life, they should not be released at all until an expert panel of biologists is convened to rethink the situation; the establishment of a research facility dedicated to their study, far more extensive than the quarantine facility, will probably be justified."

It is interesting here they are saying the most likely case is that there will be found "possible evidence of life," which I take to mean existence of at least organics in the sample. If this is what they mean then that would be a turnaround from the previous viewpoint about returned samples from Mars.
Since such samples would be returned form the top few centimeters of the Martian surface this appears to be saying they expect to find the organics there.

Bob Clark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (35 posts)