. . . but I just can't resist.

Who the hell said anything about rain on Mars?

thast a really good question, evidnetly you are the only one.

Yours is a typical negative reply, using "points" that I never mentioned at all.

His reply was not toward what you wrote, but towards the article you initially posted and the data in it.

The point is that water is available. Who cares what form it's in? It can be melted. If we hit Mars at exactly the right itme and place we may very well be able to find the liquid variety.

Hey you know what? You might be right. But again this conversation has taken to more of what is in the article that you posted, and not what you said. So don't take the articles criticism personally.

Being sorry is what you should be for attacking wwhat I said with groundless and baseless opinions.

no idea where yougot that from, everything nick said was backed up with some scientific reasoning.

It is very easy to crtiticize a subject as long as you aren't willing to point out exactly WHY the postulation is in error, which it is not.

Nick pointed out exactly 'why' he thought the article was in error. . .

What so preposterous is your comment on rain.



(Justin goes back and reads the part about precipitation.) hmm. . . nothing preposterous about that to me. But I am glad you pointed that out becasue I've reread it and understand what he said better now.

-Justin Kelly