Re: Patents

gbaikie — 2/23/2002 12:04:17 PM (archived)

"Correct me if I'm wrong Tom, but those with "deep pockets" also have teams of lawyers devoted to patent protection. For the individual inventor this can be a David vs Goliath situation."

No, "David" never wins.
:)

The whole thread (20 posts)

commercial pure research? - McFly - 2/22/2002 4:03:18 PM
- My $0.02 on pure and applied research - Neophyte - 2/23/2002 1:50:03 PM
- Ownership of "pure" research - Bowser - 2/22/2002 5:47:10 PM
  - Don't be dim... - Tom Brosz - 2/22/2002 7:20:53 PM
    - Re: Don't be dim... - John Carmack - 2/22/2002 2:06:25 PM
      - Patents - Tom Brosz - 2/23/2002 7:23:00 PM
        
        Re: Patents - Rob VG - 2/23/2002 9:15:56 AM
        
        Re: Patents - gbaikie - 2/23/2002 12:04:17 PM
      - Patents - RobVG - 2/23/2002 5:49:13 PM
        
        Re: Patents - John Carmack - 2/23/2002 3:33:41 PM
        
        Re: Patents - Neophyte - 2/24/2002 7:53:10 PM
        
        Re: Patents - RobVG - 2/24/2002 9:46:07 AM
        
        Re: Patents - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2002 9:27:51 AM
      - Re: Don't be dim... - gbaikie - 2/22/2002 2:30:16 PM
- Re: commercial pure research? - Tom Brosz - 2/22/2002 4:40:37 PM
- Re: commercial pure research? - p - 2/22/2002 4:25:27 PM
  - Re: commercial pure research? - Tom Brosz - 2/22/2002 4:44:20 PM
    - I agree with Tom's definition - alcaray - 2/22/2002 6:26:07 PM
  - Re: commercial pure research? - delbert - 2/22/2002 4:40:27 PM
    - Lindy's PURE RESEARCH - Lindy - 2/23/2002 7:58:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (20 posts)