Re: Don't be dim...

Space/Science » in reply to Re: Don't be dim...

Re: Don't be dim...

gbaikie — 2/22/2002 2:30:16 PM (archived)

I agree.
Patents are supposed to be the foundation of your system, bAh, bah.
But it doesn't really actually seem to work. Maybe it did work at one time and it just needs to be fixed.

The whole thread (20 posts)

commercial pure research? - McFly - 2/22/2002 4:03:18 PM
- My $0.02 on pure and applied research - Neophyte - 2/23/2002 1:50:03 PM
- Ownership of "pure" research - Bowser - 2/22/2002 5:47:10 PM
  - Don't be dim... - Tom Brosz - 2/22/2002 7:20:53 PM
    - Re: Don't be dim... - John Carmack - 2/22/2002 2:06:25 PM
      - Patents - Tom Brosz - 2/23/2002 7:23:00 PM
        
        Re: Patents - Rob VG - 2/23/2002 9:15:56 AM
        
        Re: Patents - gbaikie - 2/23/2002 12:04:17 PM
      - Patents - RobVG - 2/23/2002 5:49:13 PM
        
        Re: Patents - John Carmack - 2/23/2002 3:33:41 PM
        
        Re: Patents - Neophyte - 2/24/2002 7:53:10 PM
        
        Re: Patents - RobVG - 2/24/2002 9:46:07 AM
        
        Re: Patents - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2002 9:27:51 AM
      - Re: Don't be dim... - gbaikie - 2/22/2002 2:30:16 PM
- Re: commercial pure research? - Tom Brosz - 2/22/2002 4:40:37 PM
- Re: commercial pure research? - p - 2/22/2002 4:25:27 PM
  - Re: commercial pure research? - Tom Brosz - 2/22/2002 4:44:20 PM
    - I agree with Tom's definition - alcaray - 2/22/2002 6:26:07 PM
  - Re: commercial pure research? - delbert - 2/22/2002 4:40:27 PM
    - Lindy's PURE RESEARCH - Lindy - 2/23/2002 7:58:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (20 posts)