Re: But you say they did not even use definitive tests of fusion

Space/Science » in reply to Umm I disagree

Success_Machine — 3/7/2002 12:27:58 PM (archived)

That just tells me that I was right: they don't know what the definitive tests for fusion even are ! It very likely IS one of those articles that I consider crap. They don't even have the theory right.

The whole thread (15 posts)

Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - R.L. - 3/5/2002 1:52:35 PM
- Oh well.....I guess we will just have to wait on the dilithium crystal technology after all. (n/t) - ebnelson - 3/7/2002 4:17:05 PM
- Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - Dave M - 3/6/2002 8:24:55 PM
  - Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - R.L. - 3/6/2002 2:39:53 PM
- further criticism - p - 3/6/2002 6:22:44 PM
- Tiny Bubbles Create Nuclear Fusion -- Maybe . . . - D. Spires - 3/6/2002 5:24:13 PM
- Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - RNE - 3/6/2002 1:30:41 PM
  - Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - gbaikie - 3/6/2002 1:54:32 PM
- Re: This sort of research may be in a "crackpot" category of its own. - Success_Machine - 3/6/2002 12:16:47 PM
  - I need to worry bout my blood pressure - R.L. - 3/6/2002 4:17:32 PM
  - Umm I disagree - R.L. - 3/6/2002 3:23:25 PM
    - Re: But you say they did not even use definitive tests of fusion - Success_Machine - 3/7/2002 12:27:58 PM
      - Re: Sonoluminescence Website listed on Crank.net - Success_Machine - 3/7/2002 12:35:11 PM
        
        Re: Sonoluminescence Website listed on Crank.net - R.L. - 3/7/2002 5:06:19 PM
        
        Re: Sonoluminescence Website listed on Crank.net - R.L. - 3/7/2002 1:34:57 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)