Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed

Space/Science » in reply to Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed

Dave M — 3/6/2002 8:24:55 PM (archived)

Good post. Thanks for articulating what I felt to be problems with the experiment.

I'm frustrated by sensational reports like this that tend to hurt the reputation of not only the careless but also the legitimate researchers.

Dave M

The whole thread (15 posts)

Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - R.L. - 3/5/2002 1:52:35 PM
- Oh well.....I guess we will just have to wait on the dilithium crystal technology after all. (n/t) - ebnelson - 3/7/2002 4:17:05 PM
- Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - Dave M - 3/6/2002 8:24:55 PM
  - Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - R.L. - 3/6/2002 2:39:53 PM
- further criticism - p - 3/6/2002 6:22:44 PM
- Tiny Bubbles Create Nuclear Fusion -- Maybe . . . - D. Spires - 3/6/2002 5:24:13 PM
- Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - RNE - 3/6/2002 1:30:41 PM
  - Re: Read the fusion paper- VERY disappointed - gbaikie - 3/6/2002 1:54:32 PM
- Re: This sort of research may be in a "crackpot" category of its own. - Success_Machine - 3/6/2002 12:16:47 PM
  - I need to worry bout my blood pressure - R.L. - 3/6/2002 4:17:32 PM
  - Umm I disagree - R.L. - 3/6/2002 3:23:25 PM
    - Re: But you say they did not even use definitive tests of fusion - Success_Machine - 3/7/2002 12:27:58 PM
      - Re: Sonoluminescence Website listed on Crank.net - Success_Machine - 3/7/2002 12:35:11 PM
        
        Re: Sonoluminescence Website listed on Crank.net - R.L. - 3/7/2002 5:06:19 PM
        
        Re: Sonoluminescence Website listed on Crank.net - R.L. - 3/7/2002 1:34:57 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)