Re: NGST and TDRSS

Space/Science » in reply to Re: HST lifespan

Re: NGST and TDRSS

Raoul — 3/6/2002 6:47:07 PM (archived)

If NGST goes to L2, I'm not sure it would need the TDRSS service.

Every Shuttle repair mission has retrieved some parts of the HST.
So there are already parts of the original HST back on the ground.
And there is a scale 1 model in the NASM.

Raoul

The whole thread (16 posts)

HST lifespan - Raoul - 3/6/2002 10:30:34 AM
- Re: HST lifespan - Success_Machine - 3/6/2002 2:43:34 PM
  - Not a comparable case - Robt Clements - 3/6/2002 3:49:54 PM
    - Re: Another 8 years to go anyway. - Success_Machine - 3/7/2002 12:08:34 PM
      - Re: Another 8 years to go anyway. - Robt Clements - 3/7/2002 1:20:46 PM
- Re: HST lifespan - Robt Clements - 3/6/2002 1:26:40 PM
  - It would be a waste if technology suceeds us that way. - Marcia - 3/6/2002 1:40:37 PM
    - Limited funds and bandwidth. It'd be foolish to sink NGST (a superior insrument) due to Hubble nostalgia. (n/t) (n/t) - ectoterrestrial - 3/6/2002 1:47:59 PM
      - Yes, it would. Even more so if Hubble is still operating, nostalgia is low on the list. - Marcia - 3/6/2002 3:30:54 PM
        
        Re: Yes, it would. I agree... - ectoterrestrial - 3/6/2002 4:06:19 PM
      - NGST could be an ok instrument.... - Robt Clements - 3/6/2002 2:37:39 PM
- Re: HST lifespan - ectoagitated - 3/6/2002 11:45:03 AM
  - Re: NGST and TDRSS - Raoul - 3/6/2002 6:47:07 PM
    - Question about Hubble, Raoul. - Marcia - 3/8/2002 1:25:23 PM
      - Re: Question about Hubble - Raoul - 3/9/2002 9:32:29 AM
  - Yes, there's the bandwidth issue that I addressed before - Larry J - 3/6/2002 1:11:27 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)