Re: Question about Hubble

Space/Science » in reply to Question about Hubble, Raoul.

Raoul — 3/9/2002 9:32:29 AM (archived)

Well, Marcia, the punctures occured between 1993 and 1997 but not between 1997 and 1999 nor 2002. There were new blankets added in 1997 but not in 1999 nor this time. So, something must have happened before 1997.
I'm afraid we'll have to wait at least one month before any new picture will be shown (this time without the truncated corner even if COSTAR is still there but won't be used).

Raoul

The whole thread (16 posts)

HST lifespan - Raoul - 3/6/2002 10:30:34 AM
- Re: HST lifespan - Success_Machine - 3/6/2002 2:43:34 PM
  - Not a comparable case - Robt Clements - 3/6/2002 3:49:54 PM
    - Re: Another 8 years to go anyway. - Success_Machine - 3/7/2002 12:08:34 PM
      - Re: Another 8 years to go anyway. - Robt Clements - 3/7/2002 1:20:46 PM
- Re: HST lifespan - Robt Clements - 3/6/2002 1:26:40 PM
  - It would be a waste if technology suceeds us that way. - Marcia - 3/6/2002 1:40:37 PM
    - Limited funds and bandwidth. It'd be foolish to sink NGST (a superior insrument) due to Hubble nostalgia. (n/t) (n/t) - ectoterrestrial - 3/6/2002 1:47:59 PM
      - Yes, it would. Even more so if Hubble is still operating, nostalgia is low on the list. - Marcia - 3/6/2002 3:30:54 PM
        
        Re: Yes, it would. I agree... - ectoterrestrial - 3/6/2002 4:06:19 PM
      - NGST could be an ok instrument.... - Robt Clements - 3/6/2002 2:37:39 PM
- Re: HST lifespan - ectoagitated - 3/6/2002 11:45:03 AM
  - Re: NGST and TDRSS - Raoul - 3/6/2002 6:47:07 PM
    - Question about Hubble, Raoul. - Marcia - 3/8/2002 1:25:23 PM
      - Re: Question about Hubble - Raoul - 3/9/2002 9:32:29 AM
  - Yes, there's the bandwidth issue that I addressed before - Larry J - 3/6/2002 1:11:27 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)